ANALISIS FUNGSI RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU DI KOTA BAGANSIAPIAPI

Eka Wahyuni, Nofrizal Nofrizal, Mardianto Manan

Abstract


Green Open Space of Bagansiapiapi has different functions, the difference in community activity, the function of Green Open Space in Bagansiapiapi is ecologically, socially, culturally, economically and aesthetically uneven. The purpose of this study is to describe how the function of RTH ecologically, socio-culturally, economically, and aesthetically on the object of GOC in Bagansiapiapi. This research was conducted at Green Open Spaces (GOC) in Bagansiapiapi by using survey method by using questionnaire. Based on the result of the calculation MPE method, it is obtained the priority result. GOC used as research object in Bagansiapiapi according to the expert is City Park, City Forest, Coastal Nature Park of Rokan River Batu 6, Cultural Park, and Jalan Bintang Sungai Pabrik Park. Ecologically, the each function of GOC in Bagansiapiapi was carried out in five parks, namely City Park, City Forest, Coastal Nature Park of Rokan River Batu 6 which have good category, while Cultural Park and Jalan Bintang Sungai Pabrik Park have not good category. A micro climate regulator becomes the indicator with the highest index value due to the presence of plants that can block the sunlight and lower the environmental temperature on RTH. Socio culturally, the function of GOC in the Coastal Nature Park of Rokan River Batu 6 and Cultural Park is best category, while the City Forest is bad category. The criteria as a place of recreation becomes the indicator with the highest index value because the GOC is indeed used by the community as a place of family gathering, playing, discussing, and culinary because the location is beautiful, cool and calm. Aesthetically, the function of GOC for City Park and Cultural Park is best category, while the Coastal Nature Park of Rokan River Batu 6 and Jalan Bintang Sungai Pabrik Park get good category. City Forest have bad category in aesthetically function. Beautify the urban environment and stimulate the urban creativity is the higest index indicator due to the combination of soft and hard scape elements as well as its existence as a center of urban activity.


Keywords


Green open space; Green open space function; MPE; Likert.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nurisjah, S. 2005. Penilaian Masyarakat Terhadap Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) Wilayah Perkotaan: Kasus Kotamadya Bogor. Disertasi. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 05/PRT/M/2008. Tentang Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kawasan Perkotaan. Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang Depertemen Pekerjaan Umum. Menteri Pekerjaan Umum. Jakarta

Porteous, J.D. 1977. Environment and Behavior Planning and Everyday Urban Life.New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 446p.

Putra, E.H. 2012. Analisis Kebutuhan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Berdasarkan Pendekatan Kebutuhan Oksigen Menggunakan Citra Satelit Eo-1 Ali (Earth Observer-1 Advanced Land Imager Di Kota Manado. Info BPK Manado.Vol 2 (1): 42Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 34 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 53 Tahun 1999 tentang Pembentukan Kabupaten Pelalawan, Kabupaten Rokan Hulu, Kabupaten Rokan Hilir, Kabupaten Siak, Kabupaten Karimun, Kabupaten Natuna, Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi, dan Kota Batam. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta

Rangkuti, A.H. 2011. Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan Multi kriteriaMenggunakan Metode Bayes, MPE, CPI dan AHP. Jurusan Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Binus. ComTech. Vol. II (1) : 229-238.

Simonds,J.O. 1983. Landscape Architecture. New York: Mc Graw -Hill Book Co.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jil.11.2.p.178-190

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan

License URL: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.